Hysteria elects Presidents essays

Hysteria elects Presidents essays I, using my extreme psychic powers, have figured out that Bush will win the debates. This should go against logic. Kerry is clearly the better speaker and smarter person, right? Right. However, in a post 9/11 environment, none of that really matters. What is going to win out in the mind of the American public, intellectual arguments, or two word catch phrases? What the public today really wants is Fox News-like intellectual McDonalds. On their face, the Bush motives and arguments seem to make the most simplistic sense. If your view and your world are bourne out of simplicity and stupidity, the way to fight terror is to invade the Middle East...the rationale for anything can be easily reduced to "protecting the American people". "Mr Bush, you flip-flopped on your promises to limit carbon monoxide, and you pulled us out of the Kyoto treaty, causing international outrage." "I did it to protect American businesses." "Mr. Bush, your invasion of Iraq has de-stabilized the Middle East, and possibly made the terrorism situation worse." "I did it to protect the American people" "Mr. Bush, your tax cuts have exacerbated a huge deficit, and contributed to the economic problems we now face." "I did it to put money back in the hands of the American people." "Mr. Bush, you allowed the assault weapons ban to expire, placing AK-47s and Mac-10s in the hands of anyone who can skirt the system." "We need our arms to protect the American people." Hysteria and fear dominate our time. Logic does not. Americans very much like sexy European accents, but they don't really like high-fangled European logic, or a worldview that involves other countries. The stupidity we now face is monumental. Never in the history of the world has a world superpower been so oblivious to everything going on around it. Jingoism and chauvinism reign supreme. Kerry's "flip-flops" are nothing new to politics...they ...

Juridical and Juridicial

Juridical and Juridicial Juridical and Juridicial Juridical and Juridicial By Maeve Maddox Peter Ki asks: Whats the difference between juridical process and juridicial process? My first reaction to the question was juridicial isnt even a word! However, juridicial is a word and a Google search brought up several thousand uses of it, although the list of hits was headed by Googles little red Did you mean: followed by the word juridical. The OED acknowledges the existence of juridicial with this curt entry: a. Relating to the legality of an action.  Ã‚  b. = JURIDICAL Merriam-Webster, on the other hand, doesnt even have an entry for juridicial, My conclusion is that juridicial means the same thing as juridical, so, unless lawyers attach some specialized meaning to juridicial, Id go with juridical. A juridical process is a process determined by law. Juridical differs from judicial. The adjective juridical means relating to the administration of the law. The adjective judicial means relating to courts of law or judges. We can talk about the judicial system (the organization of courts and judges) or a judicial decision (one made by a judge). We can talk about a juridical interpretation of an action (strictly according to the law) or a juridical system (a body of laws by which a state or organization is governed). Then theres the word judicious which, although derived from the same origin as the legal terms, is a word for general use. A judicious person has sound judgment. Its to be hoped that judges will hand down judicious decisions from the bench, but theyre not the only ones who can be judicious. Careful shoppers can make judicious decisions about what to spend their money on. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:The Royal Order of Adjectives Time Words: Era, Epoch, and Eon50+ Words That Describe Animals (Including Humans)

Before the law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Before the law - Essay Example The law may be interpreted in very many ways. It may have a religious angle whereby the law represents a source of moral rightness and justice. This may mean that when one wants to find right thing or justice, all they need to do is to make an effort. According to the story it seems that justice is accessible to anyone with the audacity to take risks in order to find it. â€Å"the gate to the law stands open, as always†¦Ã¢â‚¬ 1 (Kafka para 5). The man from the country had his chance, but he chose to sit down on it. He was too afraid to make the effort to defy the dissenting voice of the door keeper and go through the gate like he was supposed to (Lima 183). That door had been his to go through but he seems to have too afraid of the first obstacle he encountered to think of alternative ways to get in (Kafka, Corngold and Greenberg 13). To this man, what he was looking for was so near, and yet so far. I think that the law in this case is a kind of a guideline for how life should be lived. Accessing this guideline and knowing how to live is the only way to be happy. The man in the parable does not know how to access the law and he is not creative enough to want to find out how he can gain entry (Kafka, Corngold and Greenberg 16). In life, many people search for what they can do to live happily. Sometimes, they find the path leading to a happy life, by they cannot gain access to the happy life simply because someone is standing on their way. They may end up in the same spot waiting for the right time to come so that they may get a chance to go where they want, but that chance might never come (Lima 184). This story impacts my life in many ways. The man from the country represents so many people who are too afraid to go the extra mile in search for the true meaning of life and happiness. â€Å"But the gatekeeper says he cannot grant him entry at the moment†2 (Kafka). Just like the man from the country, there are those people who believe every negative thing they hear. They know where to look but they do not have the courage to venture in. They instead listen to those voices around them that tell them that they cannot go in (Lima 187). In the meantime, they spend so much of their time and resources trying to please these people who will never let them have the true happiness and contentment that they are looking for. I have learnt from this story that I have the power to open and enter the gates through which I can find true satisfaction and happiness. I do not have to listen to other people w